I know what Chief can do and I know what Softplan can do. Your opinion may vary.Īs for the renderings, well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and the skill level is subject to the individual. Similar things will occur with Softplan but that subsequent learning curve is shorter- and easier in my opinion. Start trying to design any complicating aspect and you will find very quickly that you have a whole lot to learn before you will be successful. Chief is very easy to use right out of the box for "basic and simple" stuff. Your comment that "Chief wins as far as learning curve and renderings" isn't necessarily accurate.
#Archicad vs chief architect how to
I get what I need with softplan but the bottom line is that I have to be responsible for understanding how to build something and the subsequent details.
I don't expect any program to be able to fully comprehend what or how certain things go together so the need for 2D detailing is critical. With that said it is my personal belief that Softplan is easier to work with as I do a lot of details and Softplan gives me tools that don't exist in Chief.
Not going to do it for you so you are responsible for the content and appearance. But it will be a long road to get to that level of dexterity.What do you mean by "plan sets"? Construction documents? If so then either program is quite capable of putting out whatever it is that you create. Once you get the hang of it, it makes drawing unique details very quick, and dare I say almost as fun as on paper. One of my favorite parts of Revit is dynamic detail components. Then as you do more projects slowly transition out all the cad stuff into native Revit objects. In terms of transitioning from CAD, you can hit the ground walking (not running) by importing CAD details to Revit without having to put a stop on all billable work to devote to setup. Again once you get your templates set up. Not sure how custom / repetitive your work is, but if you’ve developed some particular details or styles over the years, and you use them frequently, Revit can reduce your product setup time substantially. It’s true Revit is great for big projects, however it is also great for high volume of small projects. Any of these programs is going to require an amount of time to get templates and such set up. Revit is king, and out of the box has a ton of families to help get you started. thoughts on Vectorworks, or other programs? I'm old enough that learning new programs does not always come easily, but young enough that I grew up with computers and video games so I'm not quite a dinosaur either.
#Archicad vs chief architect free
My budget and free time are both pretty tight. I mostly work alone and sub out some things but I'm working toward being able to bring on help of some sort. I also design new homes but they are high-performance and have few conventional details, and I tend to try new approaches on every project. My work is all residential, mostly renovations to homes built between 17, so lots of different building assemblies. Some architects even produce CDs on SketchUp but after 20 years of using it I am pretty confident I want to keep SketchUp for auxiliary work only. I know a few people using Softplan or Chief Architect. Other architect friends use Archicad or Revit. I have researched the options ad infinitum but have not been able to commit to a new program.Ī couple of close friends who are architects use Vectorworks and say it's great. As I crank through CDs for several homes and renovations using Autocad LT (with help from SketchUp), I kick myself repeatedly for not switching to a BIM platform long ago.
0 kommentar(er)
